by Joeli » 08 Oct 2012 00:30
Ok, it's night shift and I'm bored, so here goes some rambling. I used to do a lot of classes with about one fourth conditioning and footwork, one fourth solo work and one half drilling. They tended to follow a scheme that tries to make sure that students of different levels are brought to a same line.
1) pick a technique as a subject
2) what are fundamental skills to the subject
3) what is the situation where it happens
4a) what has to happen for the situation to occur
4b) what kind of mistakes will have to be avoided for the situation to occur right
Class starts with 25 mins of warm up (just go through the relevant bits of the body in order - loosen, warmup and gently stretch through them all) and relevant footwork for (2), incorporate some of the mindset required for (3), be it sensitivity, looseness, compilency, structure, explosiveness, whatever.
After this, some pair exercises unarmed or with dagger with (4b and 2) in mind. Get them sweat a bit. Start solo work with longsword with (2) in mind. Make references to whatever points raised in footwork and pair exercises. These two would take 20 mins.
Set up pair drills which revolve around (3). Usually this happens by reminding about basic school specific pair drills and varying them to get into the situation. Stress avoiding (4b). Introduce (1) and since everything in the class has been a lead up to the technique, it should go down smoothly. Observe and correct. If there are consistent problems, come up with a solution and drill the class through this fine-tuning. This should take about 20 mins.
Introduce variations to (1) which have (2) in common, but tweak (4a). Drill. Introduce counters to (1) through the understanding of (2). Even though it sounds complicated, the source material pretty much writes the class once you have picked the subject.
This is an example of a very bottom-up class, as everything builds up towards the main subject. The flip side is that I walk the class through my assumptations too, which is a bit counter productive if I had gotten them wrong. I am somewhat worried that a class like this makes all sort of bullshido more viable, because students are led to believe false assumptations or it creates precise situations where a faulty interpretation of a technique works. The good thing is that because all the pre-requisitions should be contained in the class, it should be accessible for the beginners and the occasional visitors. On the other hand, classes like these are hindrance for the people who are at the point where they are not able or willing to train on their own, but are experienced enough to just get bored by the thorough handing of a subject they are already familiar with. So, essentially this is a framework for a basic class. I try to remedy this by giving the more experienced ones individual instructions about variations to the technique, making them pay attention to body mechanical details etc.
Free training for about 60 mins after the class, is where where some people leave for their homes, some go to socialize in the kitchen, while some go through the difficult bits again by drilling through them, either with heavier protective kit and a bit more intensity, or a bit slower to get some specifics right. I would check up with those (as with the people in the kitchen) every 15 min or so, while spending majority of the free training time kitted up for free fencing and having a go with whoever wants to fence, and coach people while they fence each other. In the cases where there are no one for me to fence, I would do solo cutting on a pell instead or ask some keen looking person to test out some interptetations and read the source with me. Finish off with quick stretching, or once in a while with fitness tests.